Science Journal

 

 
World Rural Observations

(World Rural Observ)

ISSN: 1944-6543 (print); ISSN: 1944-6551 (online), doi prefix: 10.7537; Quarterly

Volume 17 - Number 4 (Cumulated No. 66), December 25, 2025
Cover (pdf), Cover, Introduction, Contents, Call for Papers
 
The following manuscripts are presented as online first for peer-review, starting from December 2, 2025. 
All comments are welcome; you may email us at editor@sciencepub.net, or contact the authors directly.
 

You can use the message in end of the article abstract to cite it.

To get Microsoft Documents: After you open the "Full Text" for each article, change the last 3 characters of the web address from .pdf to .doc (or .docx)

Welcome to send your manuscript to: sciencepub@gmail.com

When you submit manuscript(s), please mention that it is submitted to World Rural Observations

Marsland Press, 310 W 18th Street, New York, NY 10011, USA. 718-404-5362, 347-321-7172

http://www.sciencepub.net/rural

CONTENTS  

No.

Titles / Authors /Abstracts

Full Text

No.

1

Impact of molasses and ground corn grains as a source of energy supplementation on composition, quality, nutritional values and in vitro gas production parameters of corn stover silage

 

Hamed H. Gaafar* 1, Reda A. Mesbah 1, Mohamed E. Sayed-Ahmed 1, Abd Elghani H. Ghoneim1 , Essam M. ElKotamy 1 , Khaled M. Sharaf 1, Hamada A. Areda 2,1. Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt. 2 Department of Animal, Poultry and Fish production Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Egypt. * Corresponding author: drgaafar1@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT: As soon as the ears were harvested, green corn stover was collected and cut to a length of 1.5 to 2.0 cm with a harvester chopper machine. Chopping corn stover was unsupplemented in T1 or supplemented with 3% molasses in T2 or 3% ground yellow corn grains in T3 and stored for 45 days in plastic bags that can hold roughly 0.5 kg of weight. Then, samples were taken for determinations of chemical analysis, silage quality and in vitro gas production. Supplementing corn stover silage with either molasses (T2) or ground corn grains (T3) results in significant increases in dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and nitrogen-free extract (NFE) contents, while reducing crude fiber (CF) and fiber fractions include neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), acid detergent lignin (ADL), cellulose, and hemicellulose) contents, compared to the control (T1). However, organic matter (OM), ether extract (EE), and ash contents remain relatively stable and unaffected by the treatments. Supplementation of corn stover silage with molasses and ground corn grain results in a noticeable decrease in pH and butyric acid concentration, but increase total volatile fatty acids (TVFAs), lactic, acetic and propionic acids concentrations, while ammonia-N levels remain largely unaffected. Cumulative gas production and the parameters of rapidly degradable fraction (a), potentially degradable fraction (b), the rate of gas production (c), and the total amount of gas produced from both the soluble (GPSF) and insoluble (GPNSF) were significantly increased, while methane production components decreased when molasses and ground corn grains were added to corn stover silage (T2 and T3). In the first 12 hours, gas production was fast; in the next 12 hours, it was moderate; and in the final 24 to 96 hours, it was slower. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration, microbial protein production (MP), dry matter intake (DMI), effective dry matter degradability (EDMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), total digestible nutrients (TDN), gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), metabolizable energy (ME), and net energy (NE) were all significantly (P<0.05) improved when corn stover silage was supplemented with molasses and ground corn grains (T2 and T3). In conclusion, supplementing corn stover silage with molasses or ground corn grains improves its chemical composition, quality, nutritional value and leads to a more efficient in vitro gas production. [Hamed H. Gaafar, Reda A. Mesbah, Mohamed E. Sayed-Ahmed, Abd Elghani H. Ghoneim, Essam M. El-Kotamy, Khaled M. Sharaf, Hamada A. Areda. Impact of molasses and ground corn grains as a source of energy supplementation on composition, quality, nutritional values and in vitro gas production parameters of corn stover silage. World Rural Observatton 2025;17(4):1-14]. ISSN: 1944-6543 (Print); ISSN: 1944-6551 (Online). http://www.sciencepub.net/rural. 01. doi:10.7537/marswro170425.01

 

Keywords: Corn stover silage; Molasses and corn grains; Composition and quality; Nutritional values; In vitro gas production.

Full Text

1

2

PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION AND FOOD SECURITY PROJECT (SAIP) IN RWAMAGANA DISTRICT, RWANDA (2019-2022)

 

Jean Paul NGABO

 

Award of a Degree in Master of Science in Project Management of University of Kigali, School of Graduate Studies, P.O Box: 2611 Kigali, Rwanda. Email: ngapaul08@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT This study sought to investigate the influence of project management practices on the performance of Sustainable Agricultural Intensification and Food security Project in Rwamagana District, Rwanda. Specific objectives were to find out the influence of project planning on the performance SAIP project in Rwamagana District; to identify the influence of Project implementation on the performance of SAIP project in Rwamagana District; to establish the influence of stakeholders’ participation on the performance SAIP project in Rwamagana District; and to examine the influence of Project monitoring and evaluation on the performance of SAIP project in Rwamagana District. The researcher applied descriptive and correctional research designs. Primary data were collected from102 respondents (Project Manager, Project Team, Director of Agriculture Unit, Sector agronomist, Representative of cooperatives, Representative of water user association, Youth Group Leader and farmer promoters) using different research methods such as questionnaires, interviews and observation. Descriptive and regression analysis were utilized to analyze quantitative data using SPSS 20.0. The results were presented using graphs and tables. Results revealed that project planning (β1=0.191, p-value 0.029<0.05 and t=2.214) has a positive and statistical significant influence on the performance of the project. The results also indicated that project implementation (β2=0.396, p-value 0.001<0.05 and t=3.339) has a positive and statistical significant influence on the performance of the project. Findings proved that stakeholders’ participation (β3=0.169, p-value 0.033<0.05 and t=2.160) has a positive and statistical significant influence on the performance of the project and Project monitoring and evaluation (β4=0.228, p-value 0.013<0.05 and t=2.538) has a positive and statistical significant influence on the performance of the project.  Based on these findings, the study recommended the effective planning for all project activities, stakeholders should be involved in every step of the project life cycle. Monitoring and evaluation has to be done at every step of project implementation for project to cover the scope, to be completed within time and budget with desirable quality output and therefore achieve beneficiaries’ satisfaction.

[Jean Paul NGABO. PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND THE PERFORMANCE OF AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS: A CASE OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL INTENSIFICATION AND FOOD SECURITY PROJECT (SAIP) IN RWAMAGANA DISTRICT, RWANDA (2019-2022). Rural Observ 2025;17(4):15-24]. ISSN: 1944-6543 (Print); ISSN: 1944-6551 (Online). http://www.sciencepub.net/rural. 02. doi:10.7537/marswro170425.02

 


Key words: Project Planning; Project Implementation; Stakeholder Participation; Project Monitoring and Evaluation; Performance of Agricultural Projects and Sustainable Agricultural Intensification and Food Security Project (SAIP); Rwanda.

Full Text

2

3

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS ON THE RESPONSE OF CROP TO FERTILIZER AND SOIL TYPE USING SPLIT PLOT DESIGN

 

Lasisi T. A.(1), Oladimeji O. A.(2)*, Longe I. O. (2), Oyeniyi R. O.(3) , and Ogunbanwo T. A. (4)

 

1Department of Statistics, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomosho Oyo State, Nigeria

2Department of Statistics, Federal Polytechnic, Ile-Oluji, Ondo State, Nigeria

4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Osun State College of Technology, Esa-Oke, Osun State, Nigeria

3Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Osun State College of Technology, Esa-Oke, Osun State, Nigeria

*Corresponding Author: adedipupo.oladimeji@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT: This research work is primarily aimed at determining the significance effect of factors and other consideration on yield of plant. The method of data collection is transcription from record from the department of Agricultural Technology of the Federal Polytechnic Ado-Ekiti. Analysis of variance using split plot design to eliminate the effect of those factors accordingly after the data analysis are concluded from the analysis of variance on yiled that replicates (soil types) and fertilizer effect are individually (main effect ) statistically not significance at 5% significance level since P-value > 0.05. Also, interaction effect of fertilizer and replicates is statistically not significance since P-value > 0.05 accordingly.

[Lasisi T. A., Oladimeji O. A., Longe I. O., Oyeniyi R. O., and Ogunbanwo T. A. MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS ON THE RESPONSE OF CROP TO FERTILIZER AND SOIL TYPE USING SPLIT PLOT DESIGN. Rural Observ 2025;17(3):25-35]. ISSN: 1944-6543 (Print); ISSN: 1944-6551 (Online). http://www.sciencepub.net/rural. 03. doi:10.7537/marswro170425.03

 

Keywords: Factorial Treatment; Experimental Units; Fertilizer; Crops Yield; Synthetic; Split-Plot Design; Blocking; Experimental Error; Dependant Variable

Full Text

3

4

Dispute Resolution in Water Management and Environmental Goals

 

Ayushi Mittal, Research Scholar, The ICFAI University, Dehradun, India

 

Ashish Kumar Singhal, Associate Professor, The ICFAI University, Dehradun

 

Abstract: This privatization of dispute resolution must be considered in the context of our fundamental public commitment to provide substantive justice on an equal basis to all people. We must not close the courthouse door to those who need the courts' protections. More justice, better administrated, is what both proponents of new and old forms should seek. Absorption of Alternative Dispute Resolution into public and private institutions is pervasive.' ADR has been incorporated into court procedures (and more inclusion is urged),[1]government contracts,[2] contracts between individuals and businesses,  contracts between businesses and businesses,  and statutorily mandated relationships. One senior partner at a major New York law firm estimates that he spends almost half his time mediating disputes-as a special master to the courts or by request from attorneys involved in litigation. Much of the other half is spent using ADR techniques to develop settlements for his own clients. Law firms interested in exploring settlement are increasingly resorting to ADR on their own initiative-for example, by arranging privately choreographed "mini-trials" at which both sides present arguments and evidence to the CEOs of the disputing companies in environment, even as litigation is pending in a traditional forum.

[Ayushi Mittal. Dispute Resolution in Water Management and Environmental Goals. Rural Observ 2025;17(4):36-39]. ISSN: 1944-6543 (Print); ISSN: 1944-6551 (Online). http://www.sciencepub.net/rural. 04. doi:10.7537/marswro170425.04

 

Key Words: Dispute Resolution; Company; Environment; Settlement; Contracts

Full Text

4

Welcome to send your manuscript(s) to: editor@sciencepub.net

When you submit manuscript(s), please mention that it is submitted to the World Rural Observations.

Marsland Press, 310 W 18th Street, New York, NY 10011, USA. 718-404-5362, 347-321-7172; http://www.sciencepub.net

sciencepub@gmail.com; http://www.sciencepub.net/rural

doi prefix: 10.7537

Global Impact Factor: 0.324 (2012); 0.453 (2013); 0.565 (2014); 0.654 (2015)

InfoBase Index IBI Factor: 4.79 (2015);

InfoBase Index IBI Impact Factor (IF, 2019): 2.5

IF A2016: 3.57

Root Indexing; Journal Index I2OR

 

For back issues of the World Rural Observations: click here.

 

 

© 2025 Marsland Press, http://www.sciencepub.net

 

 

 

 

 

Web counter since January 1, 2009